Total return games 39
Number split 25
Number not split 13
Throw in a draw (in the return game between the eels and rabbitohs) and you get 64% of return games being won by the team that lost the first game. Not too shabby.
Looking a little further, it turns out that of the 13 double wins/losses, 10 involved the warriors, raiders, sharks or roosters. Surprise, surprise, 9 of these 10 were double losses for our poorsome foursome. If you want to omit these duds from the analysis, you get 22 games, 18 splits and one draw, or 82% being split. Even the mighty Dragons have split 3 of their 6 return games.
My take home message: a split of return games is likely, especially between non-crap teams. What else can we read into this data, and what can’t we? Trusty Steeden probably knows better than I do, for now I’ll leave it to the reader to draw their own conclusions.

Image: A split is likely
I am startled at the depth of analysis on this blog. This split business has certainly caught me completely unawares. I hope Des has taken this into account.
ReplyDeleteThe returngameology actually inspired me to look into a different trend which I call bouncebackology. It is weird but teams who lose are frequently sent out as favourites the next week.
The most dramatic example is this - the shortest priced favourites of all teams this week, paying a measly $1.18 on Sportsbet, are ... yep you guessed it, the Broncos . . . who are last-start losers to the tune of 56-zip.
Even weirder, they are playing against a team who thrashed them 46-12 only 7 weeks ago . . . Obviously the bookies are right into returngameology?